10/01/2010
By: Marino Eccher, INFORUM Published October 01 2010 Fargo, ND
A California judge said this week that the latest round of “Roundup Ready” sugar beet seeds likely shouldn’t have been planted, the newest development in an ongoing legal battle over the use of biotech beet crops.
Opponents of genetically engineered beets lauded the move, and said they’ll continue to press for the destruction of such seed crops that have been planted already. Red River Valley beet growers, meanwhile, said they’ll continue to fight for genetically modified crops, which they consider a boon to production.
The dispute centers on sugar beets designed by Monsanto Co. to resist Roundup-brand herbicide (another Monsanto product), which would otherwise kill crops and weeds alike.
The stakes are high because the modified beets, introduced in 2007, are popular with farmers. Today, 95 percent of sugar beet growers use Roundup Ready crops, according to David Berg, president and chief executive of American Crystal Sugar Co. in Moorhead. Growers have cited the biotech beets as one of the driving factors in this year’s record beet crop.
But a coalition of organic beet growers and environmental groups sued to stop the use of genetically modified beets, claiming the U.S. Department of Agriculture hadn’t properly evaluated the environmental impact of the beets. Those groups say genetically modified crops can lead to a host of issues ranging from cross-contamination of other crops to the rise of herbicide-resistant weeds.
In August, Judge Jeffrey White, the federal district judge for California’s Northern District, ruled to halt biotech beet seeding until an environmental evaluation could be completed. The USDA issued limited seeding permits to growers anyway, arguing the step didn’t violate the ban because those plantings wouldn’t be allowed to flower. Those seeds would be used for widespread production in future growing seasons.
On Monday, White said those permits probably weren’t legal. He’ll weigh the next steps at an Oct. 22 hearing.
Biotech beet opponents are pushing for the elimination of the controversial seeding crop.
“We feel that the proper remedy is to destroy the crop,” said Paul Achitoff, a California-based attorney who represents some of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. “It was planted in violation of the law.”
American Crystal’s Berg said this week’s ruling won’t affect operations in 2010 or 2011. But he also said his company, a cooperative of Red River Valley beet growers, will continue to support efforts to keep biotech beets legal.
“It’s a way to enhance the productivity on their farms and keep producing food for people,” he said.
He said Minnesota and North Dakota produce about half of the nation’s sugar beets.
Chris Devries, a spokesman for the Wahpeton-based Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative, another beet-growing group, declined to comment on the judge’s decision while the litigation is pending. He said his company “would like to have the ability to use biotech sugar beets,” which he said have produced strong results.

Randy Rittenour of Cambell Minnesota won the drawing for a GPS given away during Minn-Dak’s seed issue. And all he had to do was sign up for our Hello, Sugar newsletter. Congrats Randy. Now you never need to ask for directions.
